Land Tenure Insecurity, Fragmentation and Crop Choice: Evidence from Uganda

dc.contributor.authorMwesigye, Francis
dc.contributor.authorBarungi, Mildred
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-19T17:39:00Z
dc.date.available2021-04-19T17:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-19
dc.description.abstractThis study uses household-, parcel- and plot-level data to analyse the effect of land tenure insecurity and land fragmentation on crop choice. We use formal land titling as a proxy for de jure land rights, and the perceived transfer rights over parcels as a proxy for de facto land rights. Using a two-part model, the study shows that both de jure and de facto land rights significantly increase the likelihood of planting perennial commercial crops, and also increase the hectares allocated to commercial crops. The results also show that when the rights to land are weak (i.e., no land titling and no transfer rights), farmers tend to grow annual crops. Land fragmentation affects more the choice of, and land allocation to, perennial crops than it does for other crop categories. Overall, the results suggest that there is a need for policies and laws that strengthen land tenure security, either through formal land titling or strengthening informal land rights, to promote the production of perennial and other commercial crops.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-9966-61-117-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://18.184.231.194/handle/123456789/1964
dc.publisherAERCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Paper 419;RP 419
dc.subjectLand tenure insecurityen_US
dc.subjectLand fragmentationen_US
dc.subjectCrop choiceen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleLand Tenure Insecurity, Fragmentation and Crop Choice: Evidence from Ugandaen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Research Paper 419.pdf
Size:
561.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: