Regulatory Capital Requirements and Risk Taking Behaviour: Evidence from the Malawi Banking System

dc.contributor.authorNkuna, Onelie Braineese
dc.contributor.authorMatola, Marrium Mustapher
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T08:16:37Z
dc.date.available2021-11-16T08:16:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-16
dc.description.abstractProponents of stringent regulation argue in favour of higher capital requirements as it issaid to promote financial stability. Opponents of higher capital requirements argue that capital adequacy rules may not enhance stability but may in fact increase a bank's riskiness. The paper tests this hypothesis with a dynamic panel data model for eight Malawian commercial banks. Results reveal that there is high persistency in risk-taking behaviour of Malawian banks. Further, the study finds that high capital ratios reduce bank risk-taking behaviour of Malawian banks through reduction in Non Performing Loans (NPLs) ratio and investment in high risky assets. Based on these results, imposition of stringent penalties on banks that fail to meet minimum capital requirements and strict enforcement of regulation is key to ensuring that all banks sustain sufficient capital buffers and hence safeguard stability of the banking system.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://publication.aercafricalibrary.org/handle/123456789/3195
dc.publisherAfrican Economic Research Consortiumen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Paper 487;
dc.titleRegulatory Capital Requirements and Risk Taking Behaviour: Evidence from the Malawi Banking Systemen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Research paper 487.pdf
Size:
539.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: